I have, by so doing, assumed serious
obligations toward you. I must needs produce under this title something
more than mere fantastic reflections upon works of art, or more or less
attractive stories about their authors and the circumstances in which
they lived. It will not be so amusing, but assuredly it will be more
profitable, and that is all for which I aspire.
Art, then, is an act whose semeiotics characterizes the forms produced
by the action of powers, which action is determined by aesthetics, and
the causes of which are sought out by ontology.
/ Ontology examines the constituent virtues of the being.
|
Art. < AEsthetics examines its powers.
|
\ Semeiotics characterizes its forces.
/ Inherent form of sentiments . . . . . . AEsthetics.
|
Art. < Metaphysical form of the principles . . Ontology.
|
\ Organic form of signs . . . . . . . . . Semeiotics.
The object of art, therefore, is to reproduce, by the action of a
superior principle (ontology), the organic signs explained by
semeiotics, and whose fitness is estimated by aesthetics.
Semeiotics is the science of the organic signs by which aesthetics must
study inherent fitness.
AEsthetics is the science of the sensitive and passional manifestations
which are the object of art, and whose psychic form it constitutes.
If semeiotics does not tell us the passion which the sign reveals, how
can aesthetics indicate to us the sign which it should apply to the
passion that it studies? In a word, how shall the artist translate the
passion which he is called upon to express?
AEsthetics determines the inherent forms of sentiment in view of the
effects whose truth of relation it estimates.
Pages:
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398